|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Expanding wireless network
We have a small wireless extension to our wired network using Linksys 802.11g devices. We are now thinking about expanding the number of computers with wireless access.
At present we have one access point but as there will be 19 machines within one area I don't think this will be enough so I considering adding another access point at the other end of the area. The reason I am considering this additional access point is to ensure the bandwidth available for each machine is as high as possible. My questions are these: Does what I'm suggesting make sense? Do I set up both access points with the same SSID and channel? If they both have the same SSID will a machine "choose" the access point with the strongest signal or will I have to manually choose the closest? Any other suggestions welcome. Cheers DJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,453
|
yes it does.
the SSID's should be the same across the enterprise (or at least the same on the campus). this way no one has to worry about changing SSID's when they move for place to place within the company. Yes, the clients will choose which AP to use as long as the client software supports that (most do) and does not inexorably associate a client with 1 access point. You will find a funny thing happen tho and that is a few clients will "prefer" 1 access point over another regardless of the AP's status (can never figure out why).
__________________
Veritas Principium Libertas |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Excellent thanks for you reply.
So adding an extra access point in one area should increase available bandwidth two fold. Thanks again. DJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
__________________
Asus A7VN8X-E/Athlon XP 2500+ Barton Retail/512MB Kingston PC3200 DDR RAM/Enermax 340W PS/Seagate 20GB IDE HDD/Western Digital 120GB IDE HDD/Generic 52X CD-ROM/Lite-On 52x24x52 CD-RW/Generic 1.44MB floppy/Viewsonic A90 Monitor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
What I really meant was if I have two access points in one area rather than just one then assuming that the machines within this area are split equally between each access point then the available bandwidth will not be used by as many machines - hence more bandwidth available for each machine.
DJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,347
|
It would depend on exactly how the access points are connected back to your switch. You have no more bandwidth than the slowest shared link in your network.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|