Window XP

[lil Jimmie]

Here is a link to MS's XP OS intro

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/
What are your thoughts of this new OS?

[reboot]

Being based on the Win2k kernel, and not 95/98/ME, it should be a really nice OS.
About time.

[DrZaius]

I like that it is based off of Win2k base, which is very stable. But, I really don't like the GUI, they are trying to make the entire system look like a big Flash animation. I just hope they don't bloat it with useless features, just for the sake of having "new" features. Just a few thoughts.

[M. A. Dockter]

Win2K:WinXP::Win95:Win98

[Xayd]

They're gonna use some sort of hardware id number stamp instead of product keys, though. Which translates into you having to call M$ to get permission to change your mobo and processor?

I think not...

Xayd

[Floppyman]

An OS based on win2k with gaming performance and stability like win98 plus SMP support would be perfect, be great to see it turn out that way.

Xayd has also has a good point though, plus how much are we gonna have to shell out for this? Remember how much win2k cost? Depending on the price I may not even buy it, and just use linux and win2k.

[Charliey]

the funky flash-looking interface is just one of many possible interfaces. it also includes the older style windows interface. and it has the ability to use skins, so you can customize it.

[Statica]

from http://www.userfriendly.org

[HAL9000]

Sorry there Floppydude, no SMP support for the "home edition", but there will be a professional series with SMP.

[RJ]

DrZaius, don't worry. What you see now of Whistler GUI only is a new desktop theme.
I also don't like it very much, many things look like Win3.11. . .

There's also the windows standard theme

And besides that ugly fat new start menu the nice standard one also is in whistler

RJ

[Floppyman]

Hey Hal,

Do you know how much that proffesional version will cost? Maybe it's best to just stick with linux instead

[HAL9000]

Haven't heard any dollar figures yet Floppydude.

[Riggieri]

Got a couple of thigs to say.
From all accounts, all versions of XP support SMP. Not 100% on that though.
If you havn't used it, then don't bash the interface. I love it, and it makes computing a little less duller. Grey is out.
I am running Windows XP with an office XP beta on top. Can you say stable, and thay fit together ncie.
I also tink this is more than just an upgrade to Windows 200. They are merging the lines, no more two kernals. It will be eaiser for people to write programs, and more features can be implemeted.
Oh, and the Product ID, if you check the XP FAQ, you will see that it has been tested, and allows for upgrading very easily. Go check it out on their site.

That is all.

[mosquito]

Hmm, I can't even install office XP on my win2K box (and it's an official corporate beta. The installation is crashing on a permission problem. The only solution I found so far is to install everything from scratch.

[Riggieri]

Ya,t hat is wht i have, the corprate Beta.

[jotto84]

Does anyone know if XP will be a replacement for servers? Will there be a server version?
Will MCSE tests change to meet the XP settings?

[DrZaius]

I don't think that XP will be for servers. It is really oriented towards user friendly home/work use and is just one step before .NET. I think Win2K Adv. and Server will be the MS server OS for a while.

[Riggieri]

Actully Dr. Ziaus, Windows Xp in Windows.Net, just like Office XP is office.net. I think Microsft changed the name to be less confusing. I am running an all.net interface, Windows, Office, and Visual Studio. Looks great together. I am pretty sure XP is .NET.

[DrZaius]

Riggieri,

From the Microsoft XP site:

Windows XP is an important step towards the Microsoft® .NET vision of making information available any time, any place, on any device.

You are correct in that XP will be able to use .NET, but .NET services are not yet available. Also, there is no (or won't be) a .NET operating system or applications (like Office.NET), .NET is just a "service" that will provide software and automatic updates through the net.

[Floppyman]

This all sounds interesting, and makes me want to try the beta. Anyone care to burn me a copy of the beta for me to try out? Or is this highly illegal? Thanks.

[Riggieri]

Aorry about the invorrect info. I had heard it wrong!!

[DrZaius]

Everyone interested should check out the WinXP introduction video (around 50 mins.), good preview of what's to come and explains a lot of the XP and .NET details.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/guide/emplive.asp

Floppyman: Only official testers are allowed to use and preview the Beta releases, but everyone who wants to use it has found a copy one way or another (mainly FTP sites).

[Floppyman]

Do you know of a site where I could get it? I'm not super excited about a new OS from M$, but I'd still like to see what it's like now, then I won't end up wasting my money later for nothing if I don't like it.

[Statica]

Please dont use the board to post them, cos am sure they arent legal. However if you were to email it we wouldnt know!

[Floppyman]

Realizing I could get in trouble for this, forget the idea, I'll just read the reviews, and in the meantime, I'll work on firing up linux again, since it's free

[ylen13]

Originally posted by Statica Please dont use the board to post them, cos am sure they arent legal. However if you were to email it we wouldnt know!

the chances that u are actually gona get in trouble are .000000000000000000000000001
check your email just incase u still wante to try out windows xp beta version.

[mosquito]

.NET is a new way of developing applications. It has a lot of features that can be compared with java. You compile your applications to platform independant IL (Intermediate language). When the application is executed a JIT (Just in time) compiler will compile the IL code you are using to machine code (optimised for your system, not like the current win32 code which is still optimised for 386 computers). Another feature of .NET applications is that they are NOT com applications (so no registry usage, no more dll hell.)

Then for what is expected in the future.
Windows XP and Office XP is NOT windows.NET and Office.NET (I am positive about this because nothing .NET related is integrated in those applications + one of the microsoft guru's assured me.).

Windows XP is just the next version of Windows 2000. There will be a Windows XP Professional, Windows XP Server, Windows XP Advanced Server and Windows XP Datacenter Server. (I'm sure, I saw the XP Advanced server on the latest MSDN session)