02-28-2004, 08:55 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 384
|
Which external hard drive?
__________________
p4p800mobo, raidmax scorpio case, lite on dvd, cdrw, 120 Gb hdd, 512 ddr, onboard sound, P4 2.6, 800Mhz fsb, radeon 9600 pro.....NEW!!!!!!-- Viewsonic 19 in. Ultra Brite E90F+SB, Longitech Z-2200 speakers (I cant get enough of them), Lite On- DVD+or-RW 8x
|
|
|
02-28-2004, 08:57 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,476
|
If it was me, I would go for the Maxtor drive, as both are the same capacity, same RPM, and have the same cache, but the Maxtor is $30 cheaper.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 07:55 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,379
|
I would go with the seagate, it has a lower seek time.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 07:58 AM
|
#4
|
|
Airbus forever
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Offenbach/Main (Germany)
Posts: 8,525
|
I would go with Maxtor because that is a quality hard drive. Seagate is just crap. It seems that newer Seagates are quality products again, but unless they prove to run for at least 4 years without problems I don't trust them again. Every Seagate (except one) that my friends and I had is dead.
RJ
__________________
All's right with the world when your PC is working right.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 08:37 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,744
|
__________________
Better to use a Mac and be THOUGHT a fool, than to use Windows and REMOVE ALL DOUBT
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 05:20 PM
|
#6
|
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premiere Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 24,633
|
Of those 2, I'd get the Maxtor for 2 reasons:
1. Cheaper
2. Better than Seagate in my opinion.
They are both 8mb cache drives and are Firewire capable. I much prefer Firewire to USB 2.0, it's a lot less flaky.
However, if I were buying an external prebuilt drive, I'd get this one:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...=BROWSE&depa=1
Yeah, it's expensive, but it's huge and I prefer WD.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 05:40 PM
|
#7
|
|
I'm too sexy....
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arleta, California
Posts: 2,287
|
From the 2 in the beginning I would choose the Maxtor only because they are bette quality than Seagate.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 06:33 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,379
|
Are seagate really that bad? I was looking into buying a new hard drive, and the seagate model was at a higher price than the western digital, and the maxtor, and had better specs.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 07:12 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,476
|
Just because the Seagate was more expensive, doesn't mean its of better, or even equal quality.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 07:13 PM
|
#10
|
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,379
|
I know that, I was talking about the higher specs.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 07:43 PM
|
#11
|
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premiere Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 24,633
|
I prefer proven reliability to raw specs.
|
|
|
|
|