Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Software Discussion & Support

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-22-2010, 07:56 AM   #1
Member (3 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5
Mp3 converters....

Time to time I need to convert my music from wav to mp3, what audio converter you can recommend?
Crater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 12:41 PM   #2
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,776
http://cdexos.sourceforge.net/
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 03:12 PM   #3
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 785
I used CDex for a long time. It's good.

Recently I started using FreeRIP ... seems very good too and a little faster (just a little). Annoying splash upgrade ad though.
__________________
1: HTPC: Intel BadAxe2 / Intel Core2 Duo E6600 / Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800 2GB + TeamElite DDR2 800 1GB / Galaxy GT430 / Seagate 320GB SATA3.0 7200.10 / LG DVD-RW / Seagate 250GB UltraATA100 / Samsung FDD / PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 / Cooler Master Centurion 534 / Vizio 55" LCD / Win 7 Ultimate
2: Gigabyte GA-970A-D3 / AMD Phenom II X4 955 / Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 8GB / Asus ATI Radeon EAH3850/G / Seagate 500GB SATA3.0 7200.11 + 1 GB 7200.12 / Samsung DVDRW / Asus DVD-ROM / Sony FDD / Corsair 550W PSU CMPSU-550VX / Cooler Master Mystique Case / HannsG 19" LCD / Klipsch Pro Media 2.1 / Windows Vista Ultimate
XenaWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 07:32 PM   #4
Member (9 bit)
 
Iamjosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: from here to enternity
Posts: 398
Here is another:

http://www.dbpoweramp.com/
Iamjosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 02:11 AM   #5
Professional Cow Tipper
 
juppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Enid, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,859
I just use Audacity. Works great. Although, MP3 isn't native to it....you have to download and install the "LAME MP3 encoder" separately (their site tells you how to do it though....it's easy). But I like it because it's fairly easy to use.

XenaWP > You said you used CDex......have you ever had any problems with it's mp3 converter not working right? Because that's why I went to using Audacity......I always loved CDex for ripping, but a lot of times if I used the button that took the music directly from the CD and made an mp3 out of it (compressed audio, I think CDex calls it) it would seem to save it okay, but then VLC couldn't play it. I could take that same "broken" file, load it in Audacity, use Audacity with the LAME encoder to resave it in mp3 format again, and *then* VLC would load it just fine. I don't know whether it's a problem with CDex's encoding process or whether VLC is just being picky or what? This ever happen to you, or any insight?
__________________
Excellent guess, Kreskin! Wrong...but excellent.
*quote from Space Quest 6*
juppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:01 PM   #6
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 785
Juppy, I've ripped about 50 CDs to MP3 with CDex and do not remember any glitches in the files. I play them on a Sandisk C250 player. I did downgrade to an older Lame encoder because they most current one worked painfully slower than the older one. You might try downgrading your Lame encoder. The program itself has been updated too, that might be worth a try.

What MP3 settings are you using?
XenaWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 02:49 AM   #7
Professional Cow Tipper
 
juppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Enid, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,859
That could be it. The version, well....the file shows Lame 3.98.2, but in the settings it shows Lame version 1.32, engine 3.97 Beta 2. Dunno if that's older or newer than yours. As for the settings, I pretty much left those to default. Changed a few other things on initial setup but I didn't really mess with the mp3 part. Any tweaks I'm missing?
juppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 12:33 PM   #8
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 785
With vers. 1.51 of CDex, I found vers. 3.96.1 of the Lame encoder to be faster and glitch-less. It was the 3.98.2 version of the encoder that slowed down significantly for me.

The settings I use for MP3 are pretty much default except I set VBR min 128 max 320, j-stereo, quality High.

However, I don't encode MP3 any more ... I use OGG now and FLAC.
XenaWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 01:34 AM   #9
Professional Cow Tipper
 
juppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Enid, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,859
That may be something else too....my CDex is a different version than yours is. Mine's 1.70 Beta 2. My settings don't even let me do a max VBR (it's grayed out), but the min is set to 128. The other two are on stereo and quality normal.

So, is the 1.51 version newer or older than my version? Because on the sourceforge download site the top of the page is 1.70 Beta 4, then below that is 1.51 and below that is my 1.70 Beta 2.

Might have to try that 3.96.1 version of Lame though and see if it helps.

Just out of curiosity, is there any advantage to OGG and FLAC over MP3? Or is it just because you don't have to jack with the Lame MP3 encoder that way?
Thanks for the reply BTW. And sorry to the OP.....really wasn't intending to hijack your thread with my own problems.
juppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:33 AM   #10
Member (3 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5
Thanks for your offers guys, what about this converter http://www.myformatfactory.com/
Many options and different formats, is it good or bad converter?
Crater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 09:52 AM   #11
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 785
Juppy, so I too have since upgraded to CDex 1.70b2 now ... but I'm only using it for OGG encoding occasionally. 1.70b2 is fast with OGG, but I haven't tried the 3.98.2 Lame encoder with it. Maybe the updated application uses the updated codec better.

Is OGG better? Well, it's less universal, so that's not as good as MP3. However, my current players both support it (Clip+ and Cowon). But I like what the community says about it: "Ogg Vorbis is a new audio compression format. It is roughly comparable to other formats used to store and play digital music, such as MP3, VQF, AAC, and other digital audio formats. It is different from these other formats because it is completely free, open, and unpatented." and "If you decide to sell your music in MP3 format, you are responsible for paying Fraunhofer a percentage of each sale because you are using their patents. Vorbis is patent and license-free, so you will never need to pay anyone in order to sell, give away, or stream your own music."

FLAC I use just to digitize my highest quality music. It takes up a lot of room, so I use it selectively. Is it better? Well, it's lossless, so it's a way to preserve all the detail in the original. It's open source, which to me is good. Truthfully, I tried to hear a difference in my playback rig (Clip+ and earphones) and to me, OGG and FLAC sounded pretty much the same. Maybe on my big hifi system it would be more noticeable.
XenaWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 10:25 AM   #12
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,776
Why are you looking at converters that cost money when you have been referred to free open source software? I'm getting the impression that you may be posting with the sole purpose of advertising........
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 02:07 AM   #13
Professional Cow Tipper
 
juppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Enid, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by XenaWP View Post
Truthfully, I tried to hear a difference in my playback rig (Clip+ and earphones) and to me, OGG and FLAC sounded pretty much the same. Maybe on my big hifi system it would be more noticeable.
Heheh....I probably wouldn't notice the difference then either. I ripped several different MP3 versions of a song when setting up CDex, different bitrates on each one, and I couldn't tell the difference between the so-called high quality and the lower bitrates. Didn't notice any sound quality difference until I set it so low that the music started cutting out in places. Then I was like "Hey! There's the difference now!!".

Honestly, I'm thinking the trouble may lie more with VLC than with the way CDex is encoding the MP3's, because Audacity doesn't have any problem playing them. The speed of 1.70b2 with the 3.98.2 encoder seems fast enough to me, but I haven't got around to trying that older version yet either, so I can't really compare. The "doesn't play in VLC" problem was what I was confused about.

Thanks for the insight on OGG and FLAC. Much appreciated, and I might have to try OGG one of these days just to see how it compares.
juppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 06:29 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 5
Re

dBPowerAmp, CDDA Extractor are the two MP3 convertors
kristain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 12:29 PM   #15
Member (11 bit)
 
Rick Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,239
Here is a great ripper/converter. It is free (it once was commercial).
It is the only one I use when converting .wav to mp3.

http://download.cnet.com/Audiograbbe...-10016038.html
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The solutions of today are the problems of tomorrow!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Motherboard, Antec 300 case, Intel Q8200 CPU, Antec 650w Truepower trio, WD 640 Blue, WD 750 Black, WD 1T Black, Radeon 4650, 14 in 1 card reader, (2X) LG dvd Super Multi, Acer 223X monitor, Logitech pro 9000 webcam, Logitech MX5500 keyboard and mouse, Intel 2 gigabit Network, Canon IP6600D Printer, Epson V600 Perfection scanner, Linksys WRT54GL router, windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP
Rick Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 12:53 PM   #16
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,776
The free version of Audiograbber no longer has limitations? I remember when you could only rip a few tracks at a time with it.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 02:52 PM   #17
Member (11 bit)
 
Rick Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,239
There are no longer limitations.

There were limitations for the trial version, but it is now a free version (Version 1.83) with full options.
You do however need to download the Lame encoder and extract the files to your AudioGrabber program folder before you can rip to MP3. This is really no big deal because the Lame encoder is also free.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audiograbber

Last edited by Rick Hall; 03-25-2010 at 03:11 PM.
Rick Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2