Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Software Discussion & Support

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-23-2003, 03:08 PM   #1
Member (9 bit)
 
Needtoknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchaca, Texas
Posts: 488
253 minutes to load os?

Hello,
a friend's hard drive crashed, it's a soyo mobo with a pII 350, I fdisked, partitioned a used Seagate 2g hard drive and put it back together, when I go to load Win 98se it tells me after copying files for the setup wizard that it will take 256 minutes to load the os.???
I accidently knocked the analog/dig jumper off the cdrom, but I think I put it back where it goes (same as on the other cd roms around here)
I ran a fitness test on the drive, it's fine. I reformatted it just to assure myself, went ok.
I updated the BIOS (flashed) before any of this, correct update, all went well.
I am at a loss.. all hardware appears okay.
I have loaded win98se a bunch on a bunch of sloow machines and it has never said anything like this, it usually takes less time than it advises.
Help
Any and all always appreciated
(if this is a win ? please move post, thx)
__________________
I wasn't using my civil liberties anyway.

Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans.
-John Lennon
Needtoknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 03:52 PM   #2
Registered User
 
foghat46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Race Car Heaven
Posts: 347
98's installer usually lies to me, too. Why don't you just let it run and see how long it takes? It's a fresh install, it won't hurt anything if it goes wrong, and if there is a problem of some sort, it'll show up during the process. If it crashes, just clean everything out and start over. I can't think of anything it could harm.
foghat46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 04:13 PM   #3
Member (9 bit)
 
Needtoknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchaca, Texas
Posts: 488
That's what I decided to do, and it is sloowly going along, I was/am just curious if there is something obviously screwed up I am missing,
Thanks
Needtoknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 04:44 PM   #4
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
Let it run and see what it does... I've not only had long install times displayed... I loaded Win95 once and it went to 110% ?????
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News

-Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me...
taking the glide path instead.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 05:03 PM   #5
Registered User
 
foghat46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Race Car Heaven
Posts: 347
Bet it was a Packard Bell.
foghat46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 05:16 PM   #6
Member (9 bit)
 
Needtoknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchaca, Texas
Posts: 488
I'm letting it run and it is running sloow. It actually seems to be in slow motion at times, with the display unfolding on the screen like a dialup download...
Weird.

Thanks

Ps. it got to 17% then hung for 25 minutes, I rebooted and ran setup again, then got this error, SU995035 , it advises file is missing??
I did a google but it asks me to extract a file from win98 disc and seems to be referring mainly to upgrading from 95 to 98...
I recopied sys files to the c and started over(again) but it is crawling through the "load win 98 setup" screen again, so I fear nothings changed...
I'm willing to tear it down and rerun this deal, but I feel like I have for the most part done that and nothing changes..
Any ideas??
Please

Last edited by Needtoknow; 02-23-2003 at 06:54 PM.
Needtoknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 09:13 PM   #7
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
Then you're looking at these possibilities

1) A bad install CD
2) A bad CD-Rom
3) Dirty CD-Rom lens
4) Bad RAM.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2003, 09:40 PM   #8
Member (9 bit)
 
Needtoknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchaca, Texas
Posts: 488
Okay,
I thought about the install cd so I have tried it with 2 completely different cds. same result.
I can use a pull cd rom and ck that.
( I was wondering if the cdrom maybe was fubar cause I moved the jumper, not the cs etc one, but the dig/analog,) Now I understand that is sound, right?
I will pull all but and use a known good stick. ( I have pulled and reseated, already.)
I will probably use another cdrom, but how does one clean the lens?
Thank you and tia

PS-Okay, different cd rom, diiferent ram, it says it will take 290 minutes to install...
this is not a good thing, I will let it run and see if it hits error(betcha yes)
Good it have been the bios flash? I'm ready to donate the k6-2 i have in the garage, but why this is doing this has me intrigued/baffled/ready to start over...
Oh and disregard the babble about the jumper.. I got the cdrom out in the light and the pins/jumper I thought was dig/ana has the letters, T R and S, I haven't a clue what that is...
Thanks

PSS- I tried a new IDE cable for kicks, now it reads 289 minutews to load---

Last edited by Needtoknow; 02-24-2003 at 12:13 AM.
Needtoknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2003, 09:16 PM   #9
Member (9 bit)
 
Needtoknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchaca, Texas
Posts: 488
Hal!
I got it...
I went backwards to try and "undo" (reverse troubleshoot) kinda sorta..
So I went to the Soyo site and downloaded the BIOS upgrade that was 1 version older than the one that I just upgraded to. I flashed it and tried to load Win and it loaded quick and smooth and was completely, painlessly installed in 28 minutes!
here is where the downloads are, http://www.soyousa.com/downloads/ I picked the most recent for this sy-6ba+ board (the top one) There is nothing that says there are any special requirements or specs for that download...
It is just not compatible.. the flash went normally..
Any thoughts? I am so goldarned relieved to have the Pentium running so I can get the sides back on it and out of here
Lots of late nights on this one

Thanks for your brainstorming help
Needtoknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2