|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
02-01-2004, 05:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Western New York
Posts: 1,178
 |
which of these defrag better
I've got Norton speed disk is it better for defragging then the built in defrager for XP
|
|
|
|
02-01-2004, 11:44 PM
|
#2 |
|
Certified Audio Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,214
 |
I have read that using a third party program for defragging is faster than the Windows one.
__________________
"I'm not lying. I'm writing fiction with my mouth." - Homer Simpson My Miscelaneous Gallery ASUS P7P55D PRO / Intel Core i7 860 / 8GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 RAM / OCZ Vertex 2 120GB SSD / Seagate 1TB 7200.12 / Asus Radeon 5870 1GB / LG Super-Multi 22x SATA DVD-RW / Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit / Cable Modem / HT Omega Striker 7.1 Sound Card / FSP 700W PSU / Logitech MX1000 Wireless Laser Mouse / Asus 24" 16:9 LCD w/Webcam / Axiom Audiobyte 2.1 Speakers |
|
|
|
|
02-02-2004, 11:38 PM
|
#3 |
|
The Preacher Man
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,828
|
I've used Speed Disk for years on several PCs and wouldn't use anything else.
__________________
"Don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out." |
|
|
|
|
02-03-2004, 07:32 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pickerington, OH-IO
Posts: 875
|
I can't tell a difference with XP, but on Win98, Speed Disk was much faster
|
|
|
|
|
02-05-2004, 10:15 AM
|
#5 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
