|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (4 bit)
|
My price range is $650 and below, what laptop should i buy?
Hi, i'm looking to buy a new laptop and i'm ordering it so it has to be off of a major store, circuitcity,best buy, staples , walmart etc...or microsoft...my price range is $650 and below if you have any suggestions please tell.
I'm looking for the best i can get for my money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (4 bit)
|
If anyone has any suggestions please reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I like me
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
|
You need to be a little patient. People will reply with some time, but this isn't a chat room.
Have you looked at dells?
__________________
It's coming....just you wait. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
I saw a great sale on Lenovo's (ex IBM) right before Christmas. The price of one I saw got down to your price point. I know this will not help you now but I would be willing to bet there will be more sales. At that price it only offered 1 gig of RAM. You definitely want to upgrade the RAM to two gigs unless you have lots of patience. You can save money by buying another retailers RAM.
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity | Last edited by David M; 01-02-2008 at 01:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (4 bit)
|
alrighty..I won't be doing any upgrades on it hardware wise, so it needs to be as best as I can get factory default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
Your choice...how much patience do you have? For another 40 bucks (roughly), you can upgrade to two gigs. RAM is relatively dirt cheap these days. Just don't buy any beer this month.
Last edited by David M; 01-02-2008 at 01:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (4 bit)
|
I might be able to go up to $700 but I don't know how to install new parts lol...so what I need is factory default
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
Quote:
Last edited by David M; 01-02-2008 at 01:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (4 bit)
|
ok tyvm, so which laptop would you reccomend?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
Read through the forums on laptops. HP is having major quality control and customer service problems so avoid them. (The cost cutting accountants are running HP)
What do you need to do with your laptop? That is a question you need to answer before buying. You will be able to run any of the apps in Microsoft Office Suite and check your emails, but you will not be able to run at playable speeds graphics intensive new games with any $650 laptop. Figure on about $1500 and up for doing that....depending mostly upon the graphics card. Have you looked on EBAY for used laptops? If I were to buy an inexpensive new laptop today it would be a Lenovo. Thats based on information I have read in this forum and a number of computer magazines. Last edited by David M; 01-02-2008 at 02:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (4 bit)
|
I won't be playing any new games , maybe some online games like runescape but that does not take much speed to play. What i DO like to do is use webcam and instant message so i need a computer that can do that fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (4 bit)
|
is this a good laptop?? http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Toshi...oductDetail.do
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
It's better than the HP you had linked to in your other thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,358
|
These are two good laptops available from BestBuy:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....=1196469485969 $499.99 http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....=1195598868093 $599.99 The performance difference between the two is minimal, but the first one can only be bought in store since they are sold out online. The first one is actually better overall since it comes with extras and is cheaper. Last edited by Masaki 7-11; 01-02-2008 at 04:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,781
|
Dell Inspiron 1520 configured with XP. $619 plus tax. The basic configuration (1gb ram, 80gb hard drive) will run XP very well, but will be doggy with Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,358
|
The two laptops I posted above are better since they have double the ram and hard drive as well as good integrated graphics. Overall good laptops for the price, especially the $499 acer laptop which also has extras like better speakers and a built in webcam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
|
Those are both Turions though, and one of them is a Compaq (yuck). You will get much better battery life with a Core 2 Duo system like the Dell Inspiron 1520. They also come with Vista, which is more of a resource hog; the 2 GB of RAM is not necessary on XP. The Vostro 1500, which is identical to the Inspiron 1520, is available from Dell Small Business for $20 less with the Core 2 Duo upgrade (but make sure to upgrade from the base Celeron M).
__________________
Computer: Intel Core i5-750 2.66 GHz quad-core processor @ 3.71 GHz | Asus P7P55D-E motherboard | Crucial 4 GB DDR3-1333 RAM | nVidia GeForce 8600GT | 2x WD Caviar Black WD1501FASS 1.5TB hard drives in RAID 1 | Antec Sonata III case with Antec EarthWatts 500-watt PSU | Dual Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP 24" widescreens | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Other: 2005 Subaru Legacy 2.5GT sedan 5MT | Samsung Epic 4G Smartphone | Mamiya M645 1000S medium-format SLR with 55mm f/2.8, 70mm f/2.8, 210mm f/4, teleconverter, 120 and 220 film backs | Olympus E-PL1 Micro-4/3s DSLR with 14-42mm and 40-150mm lenses |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,358
|
From a performance point of view, the AMD laptops are better, if battery life is more important, then the Intel laptops are better. Intel processors are generally better, but AMD has the best all around package at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
|
AMD and Intel have similar performance. Just as on the desktop side, AMD is better in some benchmarks, Intel is better in others. Either way, you will get fine performance from either side -- the dual-core architecture is more important than raw speed, and even so, both manufacturers have plenty of raw speed, too.
And the ATI chipsets may have better graphics, but they're still integrated, so you'll still get better performance if you pony up the money for a discrete system. Furthermore, ATI chipsets have some stability issues that Intel ones generally don't (although luckily, they are nowhere near as bad as VIA).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,358
|
ATI drivers are updated much more frequently than Intel drivers, so generally you have less problems with ATI drivers than with Intel. The other problem is that the price range is $650, so it's not very easy to get a computer with integrated graphics at that point. At $500 it's hard to go wrong with the listed specs and the quality of Acer (not the best but then again not many problems).
Lastly VIA does have problems with windows, but you aren't going to find a company which has better driver support for linux than VIA. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
|
Frequency of driver updates is less important than coding stable drivers in the first place, and for that matter having good quality control on the hardware design and production side.
In terms of graphics, yes, it's hard to get discrete graphics in this price range, but luckily augustburnsred does not do a lot of things that are graphics-intensive, so the Intel X3100 should work fine for his purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,358
|
Driver frequency is very important for graphics cards, most games can take advantage of your graphics card only if the drivers are updated. How else would you get 10-20% increases in new games simply by updating video card drivers. Based off his stated requirements, the acer laptop should run great, has decent battery life, a good price and a built in webcam. Why bother getting a faster processor at a more expensive price and lesser specs (ram, hard drive and video card) when everything you want is available in a nice package at a good price?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
|
It's not a faster processor, it's one with better battery life. And we're talking about chipset drivers here, not video card drivers. The Acer is also sold out online, and since it's the low-priced laptop of the week, there's a good chance it's sold out in stores too. And even though Acer has decent reliability and support, I'd still rather have a Dell, since their support is excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,358
|
The AMD laptops usually have at least 3 hour battery life, if you need more than that at a time, then the Intel one should be better, but it depends on what kind of features you want as well, the acer laptops are easy enough to find at most stores and come with good configurations, and useful extras like a webcam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,781
|
The 1520 comes with a webcam too if I'm not mistaken - and I highly doubt you can find an Acer with XP any more - which just about mandates 2gb of ram for Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,358
|
For advanced computer users that use many programs, xp is best, but most people that I've built a computer for and was used mostly for email, IM, internet, webcam, and office applications were very happy with vista generally had less problems with it than xp. Acer computers now generally come with 2GB of ram, so there shouldn't be a problem regarding memory. I'm running my laptop with 1GB Ram and Vista Premium with no aero interface and it works great.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|