|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 365
|
A Good (cheap) Laptop for Audio? (Audacity)
Hi,
The most cpu intensive thing I want to do on it is to use Audacity to change the tempo of various mp3s. In an ideal world, if it exists, I would like to do that realtime- ie, directly at playback- enter a tempo and let it change it immediately rather than re-writing the whole song. I would like the laptop play the music from its own speakers or hook it up to a stereo system and let it play though that. I was all set to but the Toshiba Satelliteb 17.3" AMD Athlon 2 Dual-Core M320 2.1GHz 3GB Ram (L550D-00Q) or the Toshiba Satellite 17.3" Intel Dual Core T4300 2.1GHz 4GB Ram(L550-00R) but then I read a customer review saying that it sounds terrible and that is sometimes hangs up (choppy) on playback! Both are about $600 Canadian. So, I don't know... how expensive tdo I have to go? thanx
__________________
Netbook: Sept 2010 Acer Intel Atom N450 1.66 GHz, 1GB RAM, 160 GB Harddrive, Windows 7 Starter Edition LapTop: Feb 2010 Toshiba Satellite AMD Athlon II Dual Core M320 2.1 GHz, 3 GB Ram, 270 GB Harddrive, Windows 7 Home Premium Edition PC: built in 2002 (with a LOT of help from this forum!) XP Pro SP2 on P4: 1.6GHz (512K NW)-478 , ASUS P4S533 SiS645DX audio S/PDIF LAN ata133 USB 1.1 | Case, Power & Fans-Antec SX1030B | Maxtor DX740-6L 40G ata133 7200rpm 2mb buffer |Lite-ON 40/12/48 LTR-40125S | ATI OEM 8500LE 64 MB w/DVI | 512 MB DDR333. Added Spring 2006: Maxtor 250G ata133 7200rpm (failed August 2009 ), 1 GB DDR333, USB 2.0 (never really worked), Hauppauge WinTV PVR 350 (never really used), Samsung 16x DVD+-RW 5x Dual Layer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Wrench Bender
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Plymouth,MN
Posts: 5,961
|
Just about all laptops sound bad with the built in speakers. Use headphones or an inexpensive set of speakers. Not sure if one is better than the other. I would think that what the chipset is being used for theaudio and the audio software that comes with it would be the more important factor than the CPU.
__________________
"When sliding down the banister of life; look out for splinters pointing up."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 365
|
thank you for responding!
that is good to know about the speakers then. But re the audio chipset, I am not sure? The mp3 must be read and converted- the tempo changed. Does the audio chipset do that? Not the cpu? I am trying a couple of programs- one is called CluDJProDJ and it has a llittle CPU usage bar at the top. And ya, it crashed once on my 1.6 GHz. That's kindof why I intially posted this in the audio forum...... I will ask over there. Thank you again for responding
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|