|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
MS-DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1
While today I succesfully installed MS-DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1 onto an ancinet P-200(with MMX
). I was amazed the setup looked like the setup for Win2K (but different than any Win95/98 setup I've seen).Anyways, your probably wondering why on earth did I revive such a dinosaur of an OS... Becuase I have a couple old DOS gmes that don't run on Windows 2000 so I dug through my closet and found me a nice PC to run DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1. ![]() Except there is a problem(while, a few issues anyways). I can get into the DOS shell and Windows fine. Except at the DOS prompt I cant access the CD-ROM I installed... When I boot the PC it goes to the DOS shell, I'd rather have a command prompt or go into Windows instead, any suggestions on how to achieve this? Also, arn't there now free updates to MS-DOS 7.0 and Windows 3.11(or is windows 3.1 the same as 3.11?)? TIA, L J
__________________
Main: Gigabyte GA-770T USB3 - Phenom II 840 - 4GB DDR3 - Radeon 5750 1GB HTPC: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 - Athlon II 250 - 4GB DDR2 - Radeon 5670 512MB HTPC: Zotac GeForce 6100E-E - Athlon X2 5800+ - 4GB DDR2 "Play a Windows CD backwards and you'll hear satanic voices, thats nothing, play it forwards and it installs Windows." |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Professional Cow Tipper
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Enid, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,859
|
Hi Logan,
It's been awhile since I've done anything with DOS 5.0, but I'll give it a shot. When you say it boots to the DOS shell, are you talking about one of those old shell programs that gave you more of a GUI approach to organizing files than the DOS prompt itself? If so, the shell program will be loaded in the AUTOEXEC.BAT file. When you get to the C: prompt, type EDIT AUTOEXEC.BAT and see if there's a line in there that is loading the shell program (If the EDIT doesn't take you to an editing screen you may have to be inside the C:\DOS directory). I don't know what its called, but it should say something like C:\DOSSHELL\DOSSHELL.EXE. In order to cancel it loading you can just type REM in front of where it starts, like REM C:\DOSSHELL/DOSSHELL.EXE. If that doesn't cancel it, just take the REM back out and it will be the same again....better than deleting it IMO. If you would rather have it boot directly to Windows, in the AUTOEXEC.BAT file add a line that says C:\WINDOWS\WIN (I think that was it anyway) ![]() Okay, as for the CD-ROM not working, its likely because you don't have the drivers loaded for it. I don't know if the CD-ROM takes a specific driver or if just a generic driver would work. When I used to have to do this on my machine it had a driver by some company called Oak or Oaktree or something...anyway, it was a NEC CD drive so I don't know how there would be a corelation between those two companies. I'll try to give you the short version here cuz I realize I'm writing a book. ![]() Here's the old AUTOEXEC.BAT AND CONFIG.SYS files off of my old machine's boot disk. They should be close enough to work for yours too, I think. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Excellent guess, Kreskin! Wrong...but excellent. *quote from Space Quest 6* Last edited by juppy; 06-30-2004 at 11:00 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
OK, the version of DOS I have is from an old compuad which lacked a CD-ROM, so the version apparently lacks CD-ROM drivers...
So I downloaded MSCDEX v2.33 from microsoft. The problem is I don't think that includes drivers? The CD-ROM is a Sony. L J Last edited by Colonel Sanders; 07-01-2004 at 01:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
as far as the upgrade.......DOS 6.2 was the last boxed version. It had some signifigant upgrades to 5.0
just as a test run I googled MSCDEX (we used to call it messy ducks) and found nemerous links. Don't know if there was a 5.0 compatable version...
__________________
Nisi defectum, Exploro quippini |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
After jumping through some hurdles, I have got DOS to a point where I shall be able to run most of my old DOS games.
The only problem is I didn't realize just how small my hard-drive was... I don't remember the exact size, but when it was all said and done, I go install a game that needed 26MB, and there was not enough space. The biggest problem with this is I'm using an ancient case too, and it's quite poorly built... I will now have to pull out the MB(which is no easy task due to the low amount of space) to in order to get to the screws to swap in a bigger hard-drive.L J |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
OK, so I decided to look a little closer at the hard-drive in question. Apparently DOS setup a partition which didn't take up all of the drive... I have an extra 4GB to work with.
But I will probably still change the hard-drive for more space, and something a little more reliable. Now, it appears DOS can only handle up to 2GB partitions? What about other versions of DOS like 6? Is there any way to get around this limit, or is this something to do with FAT 16 and thus I have to live with it?TIA, L J |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tucker Ga. USA
Posts: 1,305
|
You banged your head on the fat16 limit.
But you can create an extended partition on the drive and create some additional 2gb kogical drives to the limits of the drive or available drive letters. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|