Go Back   PCMech Forums > Windows Support > Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier)

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-01-2004, 09:17 PM   #1
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
longhorn release

longhorn is set to release in 2006 but i'm kinda dissappointed that i'll probably need to upgrade by then to a 64 bit CPU. i'm pretty sure XP will still be usable for gaming but what are you guys gnna do? Upgrade immedietly or wait a year or 2?
__________________
My 1st Build: Antec SuperLANboy Case| Antec 480W Neopower| 16X Sony DVD-ROM | Nec 1.44 FDD | WD 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA HDD | Aspire Keyboard w/optical Mouse |Geil Value 1Gig| ASUS P4P800-E Delux Socket 478 | P4 3.2E 800FSB HT | eVGA GeForce 6800GT 256MB
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 09:21 PM   #2
Member (10 bit)
 
KilluminatiStyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I'm sitting right next to you!
Posts: 824
Send a message via MSN to KilluminatiStyle Send a message via Skype™ to KilluminatiStyle
....haven't really thought of it yet....but...

I suppose that Longhorn might be a good EXCUSE to upgrade.....
__________________
KilluminatiStyle

Gaming Rig
Quote:
Rosewill R5601-BK | Gigabyte GA-MA785G-UD3H | OCZGSX700 PSU | AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor | 6GB GSkill DDR2 800 | EVGA GTX260 | WD 250GB X 2 RAID 0 | WD 250GB SATA | Lite-On DVD+-RW | Lite-On CD+-RW | 120mm Front Intake | 120mm Rear Exhaust | Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
KilluminatiStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 09:42 PM   #3
Security Dude
Staff
 
kstatefan40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Derby, Kansas
Posts: 999
Send a message via AIM to kstatefan40 Send a message via MSN to kstatefan40 Send a message via Yahoo to kstatefan40 Send a message via Skype™ to kstatefan40
I will go 64 bit when there is a good assortment of programs availible for it. Longhorn isnt gonna be the only thing that will influence it. Right now, most programs do not use any 64 bit extensions and I see no need to upgrade. When it becomes mainstream and affordable, I might be more interested. You won't have to worry about it yet though.
__________________

Tyler A. Thompson
Small Business Networking Services Specialist
tyler@derbydigital.com
kstatefan40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 10:13 PM   #4
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
thefultonhow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,918
Send a message via AIM to thefultonhow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuanji
longhorn is set to release in 2006 but i'm kinda dissappointed that i'll probably need to upgrade by then to a 64 bit CPU. i'm pretty sure XP will still be usable for gaming but what are you guys gnna do? Upgrade immedietly or wait a year or 2?
IIRC, Longhorn doesn't require a 64-bit PC. The only crazy system requirement is a DX9.0-compliant graphics card.
__________________
Computer: Intel Core i5-750 2.66 GHz quad-core processor @ 3.71 GHz | Asus P7P55D-E motherboard | Crucial 4 GB DDR3-1333 RAM | nVidia GeForce 8600GT | 2x WD Caviar Black WD1501FASS 1.5TB hard drives in RAID 1 | Antec Sonata III case with Antec EarthWatts 500-watt PSU | Dual Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP 24" widescreens | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Other: 2005 Subaru Legacy 2.5GT sedan 5MT | Samsung Epic 4G Smartphone | Mamiya M645 1000S medium-format SLR with 55mm f/2.8, 70mm f/2.8, 210mm f/4, teleconverter, 120 and 220 film backs | Olympus E-PL1 Micro-4/3s DSLR with 14-42mm and 40-150mm lenses
thefultonhow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 10:15 PM   #5
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
hmm.... sweet kinda gimmicky with the 3d thing and will prolly require a RAM update... damn you M$ stop making us spend money!
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 10:20 PM   #6
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
thefultonhow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,918
Send a message via AIM to thefultonhow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuanji
hmm.... sweet kinda gimmicky with the 3d thing and will prolly require a RAM update... damn you M$ stop making us spend money!
LOL, the problem is that XP doesn't have demanding enough system requirements. My grandmother's 550 MHz PIII is smoking with XP and 320 MB of RAM. MS has gotta help the hardware manufacturers sell PCs or else the manufacturers go under and MS loses one of their main revenue streams.
thefultonhow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 10:55 PM   #7
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 382
Send a message via AIM to MrAustin
I'm going to run my current system into the ground. It'll run Longhorn with no problems. That is, if I choose to migrate to Longhorn...
MrAustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 12:46 AM   #8
Member (10 bit)
 
roomwithamoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: southern cal
Posts: 644
Send a message via AIM to roomwithamoose Send a message via MSN to roomwithamoose
I'll probably use it as and excuse to upgrade. Who knows what AMD will have out in 2 years!
roomwithamoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 02:02 AM   #9
Member (11 bit)
 
TheJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
By the time Longhorn comes out I'll be seriously considering the switch to Linux.
TheJackal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 04:55 AM   #10
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJackal
By the time Longhorn comes out I'll be seriously considering the switch to Linux.
Why's that?

Longhorn, in my opinion, is a breakthrough. Everyone who doesn't know much about computers will want the newest OS, and if they can't have it will want a new computer sooner or later.

As for 64 bit, I'm not sure what the plans are. I heard that it will support both 64 bit instructions, X86-64/IA32e, and Itanium's IA64. Since Itanium is coming down to Xeon price level, who knows what could happen? Itanium is the highest performing processor from Intel, and kicks other server chips including Opteron, but its just way to expensive. Another setback is that it can run 32 bit software, but it relies on a software component in the OS to convert the 32 bit code to 64 bit. This slows 32 bit code down severely, but Longhorn may change it. We will have to wait and see.
ric449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 10:19 AM   #11
Member (11 bit)
 
TheJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by ric449
Why's that?
Hopefully by 2006 either there will be professional quality video editing software available for the Linux platform, or there will be a Windows emulator good enough that I can run Adobe Premiere on Linux, so that I can make the jump.

Im rather tired of worrying about security holes and what odd licensing scheme Microsoft will come out with next.
TheJackal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 11:38 AM   #12
Member (11 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,525
Quote ric449: "Longhorn, in my opinion, is a breakthrough."

How do you get that; no one's even seen it yet except for some betas. Longhorn was suppose to have all this breakthrough technology, winfs, advanced grahics, etc, but that stuff will now not be in longhorn per MS's recent announcements in order to meet the 2006 release date. All this begs the question, what exactly will be in longhorn. It's beginning to look like winxp with some new eye candy and enhaced security. In short:

winme is to win98se as longhorn will be to winxp.

Not a very bright prospect IMHO. This is a very predictable scenario for MS; they do it every time. Announce new OS or application coming out "soon" that will have all this great new technology. Next, announce that the release will be delayed but again hype this new tech which is supposedly better than any competing product currently on the market. More delays, more hype. Announce greatly reduced feature set coming out "soon". This stuff never ends with these guys; they've been doing it for years.
My guess is the release after longhorn will be the real longhorn as originally contemplated or at least hyped. The 2006 longhorn will be like winme; just something new to sell to the unsuspecting till the real longhorn is done.
kilgoretrout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 11:49 AM   #13
Member (7 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilgoretrout
winme is to win98se as longhorn will be to winxp.
LOL, That is what I was gonna say. In any case, I will stay with my K6-III and w98se for a long time.
palloco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 11:59 AM   #14
Member (11 bit)
 
TheJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilgoretrout
My guess is the release after longhorn will be the real longhorn as originally contemplated or at least hyped. The 2006 longhorn will be like winme; just something new to sell to the unsuspecting till the real longhorn is done.
Will there be a release after Longhorn or could Longhorn in fact be the undoing of Microsoft?

They have spent so much money in development of Longhorn and now them planning on releasing a scaled down version, will they really turn a profit off of Longhorn... How many computer users will really upgrade. If the price is anything like the current price of a Windows XP upgrade (in canada $299.99 for Home and $499.99cdn for Pro) who would shell out the cash?
TheJackal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 01:14 PM   #15
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
OS always costs around that much in retail versions
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 01:28 PM   #16
Member (11 bit)
 
TheJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuanji
OS always costs around that much in retail versions
You cant get an OEM upgrade version... So is it really worth $300-500 bucks for something that has limited benefits over XP?

The question still stands: Who is gonna buy it when it comes out unless its gonna be as big a jump as we saw with 98SE-to-XP?
TheJackal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 01:31 PM   #17
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJackal
You cant get an OEM upgrade version... So is it really worth $300-500 bucks for something that has limited benefits over XP?

The question still stands: Who is gonna buy it when it comes out unless its gonna be as big a jump as we saw with 98SE-to-XP?
get the full version then =\ when i said upgrade i mean in the sense that you would stop using XP and convert to longhorn by any means.
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 01:41 PM   #18
Member (11 bit)
 
TheJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Maybe I wasnt clear...

What I was trying to say was that there is no way for users who have already shelled out nearly a hundred bucks for their current Windows XP installation to cheaply upgrade to something that currently is really no better then what they have right now.
TheJackal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 03:02 PM   #19
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
oh ok hmm oh well people will still buiy it so goes the way of microsoft
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 04:47 PM   #20
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
It depends.. If it has the features it says it has, and it is stable, then it will be a great OS. I think Microsoft learnt from the Windows ME fiasco, so I doubt we will see the same situation MS had with that OS.
ric449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 06:43 PM   #21
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 192
Send a message via AIM to ogrerocks Send a message via Skype™ to ogrerocks
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p...rget2006PR.asp

Quote:
Microsoft Corp. today announced it will target broad availability of the Windows® client operating system code-named "Longhorn" in 2006, and make key elements of the Windows WinFXTM developer platform in "Longhorn" available for Windows XP and Windows ServerTM 2003.
If the 'key elements are gonna eb available for XP, then what does longhorn have that XP doesn't. I'm just re-itterating what everyone has said, but backing it up a little more.
ogrerocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 07:20 PM   #22
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
it has a pretty new interface? probably just beefed up security
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 07:50 PM   #23
Member (11 bit)
 
TheJackal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuanji
it has a pretty new interface?
I aint gonna shell out my hard earned cash for a pretty (resource sucking) new interface when I already have pretty near the same features and security with XP.
TheJackal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 07:55 PM   #24
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJackal
I aint gonna shell out my hard earned cash for a pretty (resource sucking) new interface when I already have pretty near the same features and security with XP.
i guess we'll see what longhorn can do when it comes out if its just a new interface and added security it will be a big letdown for me.
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 08:28 PM   #25
kg3
Member (7 bit)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
im sure microsoft will make a profit all the prorietary computer makers(dell, hp ibm ect) willl use it because in most times the people buying those pc dont know ne better
kg3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 12:13 PM   #26
Member (4 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11
is pentium 5 gonna be 64 bit
i no it will be 5-7ghz microprosseser and all 1000fbs
but is it gonna be 64 bit
longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 12:30 PM   #27
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn
is pentium 5 gonna be 64 bit
i no it will be 5-7ghz microprosseser and all 1000fbs
but is it gonna be 64 bit
not sure what you mean cuz they are already developing 64 bit P4s and the newer p4s coming out next year are gnna be 1066FBS but Intel is definately gnna make 64 Bit CPUs a little bit before 64 bit APPs go mainstream
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 01:07 PM   #28
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
The F series Pentium 4's are 64 bit, and are available right now. Right now, they are aimed at workstations. You will probably be able to buy them sometime later this year.
ric449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 01:29 PM   #29
Member (12 bit)
 
Yuanji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by ric449
The F series Pentium 4's are 64 bit, and are available right now. Right now, they are aimed at workstations. You will probably be able to buy them sometime later this year.
yeah i saw something along the lines of thie on "The Screen Savers"
Yuanji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 01:31 PM   #30
Member (4 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11
ya but they r gonna be like an extreme edition
and cost 1000$
longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2