Go Back   PCMech Forums > Windows Support > Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier)

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-03-2004, 08:06 PM   #1
Member (3 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Running ressource intense programs as SHELL

I am currently experimenting with using ressource intensive programs as Shell (instead of Explorer.exe or Cmd.exe/Command.com) to maximize performance. Things sometimes go well, but I often get error messages telling me the program couldn't load his own configuration files. Is there a way of loading program-specific configuration files without a shell, and allow the program to access these configuration files? Thanks.
Gsohierchaput is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2004, 01:56 AM   #2
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodland Hills, CA (suburb of Los Angeles)
Posts: 4,014
I left some links for cmd.exe resources over in your other thread: you might find some helpful info in those webpages.

I don't think you'll see a huge difference in performance in XP whether running from cmd.exe or from the regular GUI. You could certainly test it out & report your findings.
. . . Gary

[My intitial feeling is that cmd.exe will be a bit too limiting for what you're trying to do.]

Last edited by GaryRouth; 11-04-2004 at 01:59 AM.
GaryRouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2004, 11:13 AM   #3
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,786
XP, being a true 32 bit operating system, does not have the resource issues that 3.x/9x/ME had. There are no longer OS "heaps", it uses physical ram and the pagefile instead.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 02:17 AM   #4
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodland Hills, CA (suburb of Los Angeles)
Posts: 4,014
[. . . just in case I wasn't very clear in my reply, the cmd.exe "resources" I was referring to are the articles on the linked webpages with information about cmd.exe in XP. Sorry if I was confusing! . . . ]

... and glc's observation about XP resource usage is the same reason I was thinking that using cmd.exe for "resource intensive" programs doesn't seem like an idea that makes much sense.

Last edited by GaryRouth; 11-05-2004 at 02:21 AM.
GaryRouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2