|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
group policy not sticking in terminal services 2000
hey everyone,
i have a windows 2000 terminal server setup and i'm trying to basically lock it down for remote users, but the policy doesn't seem to be sticking. from the domain controller, i made a new organizational unit just for the term server and moved the server into that unit. i set up a group policy and it should be affecting basically one group of users. i've locked down my computer, control panel, etc, but when the users login they still have access to everything. any ideas why the policy isn't sticking? i really don't know what information to provide besides that, so if i left something out just ask. thanks a lot.
__________________
Friends help you move. REAL friends help you move bodies. - me quite possibly the best book ever written... by me |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lexington, Michigan
Posts: 353
|
group policy
If group policy inheritance is not blocked, then domain policy could be overwriting the ou policy for that computer. I always set group policies based on users or groups.
Instead of putting the computer in the ou, put the user group and/or the users in the ou. If you just put the group in the ou, make sure it contains the correct users. your policies should apply ok. you may still have to block policy inheritance on that ou to prevent other policies from overriding your settings.
__________________
Certifiable =========================================== Cisco CCNA,CCDA CompTIA A+, Network+,Inet+,Security+ CIW Associate IBM AIX certified IBM Certified Specialist - p5 and pSeries Administration and Support for AIX 5L V5.3 IBM Certified Systems Expert - p5 and pSeries Enterprise Technical Support AIX 5L V5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
dang, that sucks. it'll only work if both the group and the users are in the ou. i know it's not a major deal, but now the ad is all untidy. haha. thanks for the help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
wait, that's not going to work. it'll lockout the user from their machine as well. can anyone think of a way to lockdown just the server with group policy?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|