Go Back   PCMech Forums > Windows Support > Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier)

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-16-2007, 08:38 AM   #1
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 213
Question Any RAM over 4GB is useless in Windows XP and Vista?

I just purchased a laptop that has 4GB of RAM in there and it only show up in the System Properties\General as 3.37GB instead of 4GB. When I called HP, the tech support says that Windows XP or Vista will not utilize anything that is over 3.37GB of RAM unless the operating is 64bit. Is this true? I've never heard such thing? Is he giving me the crap on this?
ljCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:47 AM   #2
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 175
Yup, this is true

and no he is not giving you crap
Kasturi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:57 AM   #3
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 213
Okay, then why do pc makers claimed that their pc can handle 12GB or so when it is useless after 3GB.
ljCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 09:15 AM   #4
Member (10 bit)
 
perkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 546
Send a message via ICQ to perkster Send a message via AIM to perkster Send a message via MSN to perkster Send a message via Yahoo to perkster Send a message via Skype™ to perkster
the PC can handle that, just your operating system cannot. you have a 32 bit OS which has enough memory addresses for 4gb but becuase your hardware takes some of those addresses the actual amount being used for your RAM is about 3.2gb. If you want to ultilise your 4gb ram or more if you fancy you need to upgrade yoru OS to a 64 bit version, there are 64 bit versions of XP and vista, but the XP one has more issues than the vista one.
__________________
Perkster
IT work as side project
My Current Rig:
MSI MS-6712 1.0 (socket A 462) with 2.15 gigahertz AMD Athlon XP 3000+, 2x Barracuda 160GB IDE HD's, 2x Kingston 512mb DDR PC2700 (166mhz) Memory. 2 IDE DVD drives, 1 External HD and one external DVD burner.

My first build (july 2007 for my fiance):
Asus P5B (Socket 775) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 "LGA775 Conroe" 2.40GHz (1066FSB) - Retail, Corsair 2GB DDR2 XMS2-5400C4 TwinX (2x1GB), Corsair HX 520W ATX2.2 Modular SLI Compliant PSU, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB ST3320620AS SATA-II 16MB Cache - OEM, Sony Floppy Drive, EVGA e-GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB DDR3 HDTV/DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail, Lite-On Serial ATA 20x DVD±RW Dual Layer ReWriter (Black) - OEM. Memory card reader, Windows XP SP2. Samsung SM226BW 22" LCD.
perkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 09:34 AM   #5
Premium Member
 
Statica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by ljCharlie
Okay, then why do pc makers claimed that their pc can handle 12GB or so when it is useless after 3GB.
There have always been situations in the tech world where a particular limitation has shot down the usefulness of something else. For example hard drive sizes and BIOS limitations have historically been at odds. Mobo manufacturers have provided a way to utilize more RAM slots, provided the software isn't crippled. And it isn't just a Windows only thing, a lot of OS' have similar limitations. With Linux however, given it's modular nature, it is possible to recompile the kernel to make use of the newer processors' extensions (PAE) to see more RAM... at a performance cost.
The solution is to use a 64bit OS, Vista - as mentioned - fares a lot better than XP 64bit.
Statica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 09:37 AM   #6
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 213
Thanks! To use 64bit vista, that means the CPU will have to support or made for 64bit OS, correct?

Well, thanks for your input.
ljCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 09:52 AM   #7
Premium Member
 
Statica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
Yes but most new CPUs are. What are the specs of your laptop?
Statica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 09:54 AM   #8
Member (10 bit)
 
perkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 546
Send a message via ICQ to perkster Send a message via AIM to perkster Send a message via MSN to perkster Send a message via Yahoo to perkster Send a message via Skype™ to perkster
most modern day CPUs are compatible with 64 bit, but yes your hardware would need to be compatible. If you let us know your specs we can tell you if yoru computer is suitable for a 64 bit OS.

if you have an old processor you probably wont get much benefit from 4gb ram over 2gb ram anyway since the processor is likely more of a bottleneck.
perkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 10:03 AM   #9
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 213
Thanks! I just got the new laptop yesterday with Intel Centrino core 2 duo.
ljCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 10:14 AM   #10
Member (10 bit)
 
perkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 546
Send a message via ICQ to perkster Send a message via AIM to perkster Send a message via MSN to perkster Send a message via Yahoo to perkster Send a message via Skype™ to perkster
then you will have no problems, did you buy XP or vista, i think with vista sometimes you get both versions and can pick which to install, or you can get them to send you a 64 bit version for free, sure i heard that somewhere.
perkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 10:40 AM   #11
Staff
Premium Member
 
mairving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 5,538
Installing the 64 bit version of Windows will not only be a waste of time but you won't get a performance gain currently and may even take a hit. The only advantage will be that Windows will be able to see that extra little bit of RAM that never gets used. Drivers for 64 bit versions are currently the biggest problem. Not much of anything is optimized for 64 bit. In a few years maybe but not now.

I would personally stick with the version that you have.
__________________

Want to Make $$$$ with your Computer? No Risk! Simply press shift-4 four times in a row
mairving is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 10:52 AM   #12
Premium Member
 
Statica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
What are you running that requires that 0.63MB of RAM? Most apps are going to be quite happy with 3+GB that you're using. Also consider that you're going to take a performance hit moving up to Vista (64 or 32bit) and so any gains you think will come of seeing the full 4GB of RAM will be lost in the upgrade to Vista.
Statica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 11:12 AM   #13
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
I do builds with 4gb of ram with XP 32 - so it only sees 3.25 gigs? Big deal - ram is so cheap it really doesn't matter, these machines use all they can. I'd rather run with underutilized 4 gb in dual channel than 3 gb in single channel.
glc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 01:10 PM   #14
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 213
Thanks for all your input. I was just curious why it's not using the full 4GB. We custome order this laptop for using it with Adobe CS3. Yes, I absolutely agree that upgrade to Vista right now is a bad idea. I've heard so many problems with Vista...I've actually have one machine upgraded to Vista and I arleady uninstall it because of the amount of problems and drives issue with it.
ljCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do you need an XP disc to do a Clean Install of Windows Vista over XP Chazell29 Windows OS Support (Vista/7/8) 3 10-11-2007 06:29 PM
Vista is here to stay and XP will go the way of 98. Baskervore Windows OS Support (Vista/7/8) 56 08-25-2007 12:35 PM
HD Probs with Vista and XP Dual Boot Moron Computer Hardware 3 08-07-2007 05:10 PM
Is anyone here using Vista? fredwest Windows OS Support (Vista/7/8) 7 02-03-2007 06:14 AM
How to remove windows vista beta 2 from boot loader when dual booting with another OS Computerguy2 Windows Tips, Tricks, and Tweaks 4 06-27-2006 11:58 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2