|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (6 bit)
|
I'm working on a friend's pc. It's a celeron 800mhz HP that had Win Me. It was the slowest box I ever saw. I formatted and put Win 2000 on it--it's still the slowest pc ever. Specs:
30GB Quantum Fireball hdd- ran tests with HDTune, all is OK 128 MB pc100 SD RAM (more ordered) Ive tested everything I can think of. THere's nothing running except AVG. It's a clean install, no spyware, adware etc. System says it doesn't need defragging. Checked disk, OK ,No bad blocks on disk. Before I got hold of it, owner had a guy in to "fix" a few things. He had charged her $ several times. I found the router plugged into itself, no connection to pc at all. Makes me wonder what else he did to it. WOuld changing the memory settings make it so slow? Total Physical-129,520 KB (Yes, KB is what it syas in System Info) Available physical memory-29,880 KB Total Virtual Memory-439,476 KB Available Virtual Memory- 202, o44 KB Page file space- 309,956 KB I have no idea about these settings WOuld these be appropriate? ( CPUZ shows 128 MB RAM) I fixed up an old Dell 700mhz pc with XP Home for my brother and it will run circles around this. I never saw anything as slow as this machine. WIll the 512 MB memory I ordered make a difference? SOrry post is so long but I'm stumped! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Come in Ray...
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,668
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
|
Win2K runs like molasses in January with only 128mb ram, no matter how fast the processor is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Western PA
Posts: 691
|
Yeah, you need a lot more RAM to run W2k. 512mb if it can support it would work well.
__________________
Case...Cooler Master Centurion 5 | PSU...Corsair TX750 Mobo............Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H CPU..............AMD Athlon 64 X2, OC @ 3.0ghz RAM.............2gb Gskill DDR2 800 CPU Cooler...Zalman 9700 GPU.............Sapphire 4870HD Monitor.........22" Acer LCD Storage........500gb Seagate DVD.............Lite On DVD Burner Windows Vista 64 bit |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (6 bit)
|
Well it's a relief to know that. It'll take max 512 so thats what I'm putting in it. Thanks for the answers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
|
When 2K was current, we sold systems with it with 256, that was acceptable. 512 is even better - that's what I have on this laptop with it and a 700 MHz processor - and I have a desktop with 2K and 1gb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Western PA
Posts: 691
|
I have a computer I'm fixing for myself now and it came with 128mb of RAM and Windows XP. I wonder how slow it was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
|
XP on 128 is a real snoozer. We sold XP boxes with 512 minimum, today we use 2gb with XP with DDR2 ram being so cheap.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| win xp (he) + win 2000 (prof) network | MulderMan | Networking & Online Security | 2 | 03-21-2004 01:39 PM |
| win 2000 pro/hard drive probs | doninmd | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 5 | 12-27-2002 06:54 AM |
| Win 2000 problem in install | pidge | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 4 | 09-23-2002 07:44 PM |
| Win 2000 Pro Error msg | BUGNUT | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 2 | 09-18-2002 05:16 AM |
| how to get rid of failed win. 2000 instalation | iaa | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 6 | 01-03-2002 09:38 PM |