|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 687
|
Norton AV or McAfee AV?!?! Damn it!!!
Which one to purchase !?!?
__________________
I Like Jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
|
I personally like Norton AntiVirus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 768
|
Another vote for Nortons
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,386
|
I like Norton as well. It seems like McAfee misses things more frequently than Norton.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Margaritaville, Iowa
Posts: 169
|
Definately go with Norton AV...and make it a practice to keep your definition files updated...check for updates about 4-5 times a month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
|
I'm using NAV2002 and it downloads the updates automatically. It can do a scheduled daily/weekly/monthly scan as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,261
|
NAV without a doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Computer Slave
|
Another vote for Norton!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
|
On Win98SE, NAV caused all sorts of problems on my machine. wouldn't even allow Windows to load. So i used McAfee and it was quite good, no virus problems, but it did have it's bugs.
Now on XP Pro, i'm using NAV 2003 and it's running like a charm, no complaints. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pickerington, OH-IO
Posts: 875
|
I switched to NAV - live update works fine and it has already caught several viruses from files I was downloading.
Also, you can download a copy of Norton Utilities for free when you purchase NAV online for $49.95. Last edited by Prew; 02-23-2003 at 07:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
Anything but McAfee.
Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The U S of A
Posts: 114
|
McAfee would be taking a step backwards,definitely Norton AV!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,557
|
Norton without a doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
|
Norton.... McLaughee IS a virus.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 288
|
I would go with NAV.McAfee,I used to have and had many problems with it esp. when I tried to uninstall it.
__________________
Win XP Home,Pent.4 (1.5 GHZ)40Gig WD Hardrive,512meg DDR ,Nvidia Geforce2 mx/mx400,SoundBlaster Live 5.1,Asus P4B266mobo.Memorex 12x 24x 52x cdrw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
I vote for NAV too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchaca, Texas
Posts: 488
|
Not completely on subject, but what's wrong with AVG, it's free and I haven't ever had a prob has regular updates and all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 288
|
AVG is a great one also,I have it on my other machine and your right it`s good ,free and you can update it on a reg. basis.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|