|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
does turning off "eye-candy" make a dif?
hey, i was just wondering if you ajust windows for "best performance" instead of "best appearance" that if it makes a difference, and if so if its noticable and worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 343
|
I suppose you are talking about Win XP, yes it does make a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
Yes Windows XP. in your opinioin is it worth it not as looking good? Like, is it THAT big of a difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,557
|
I never noticed any differnce, except for appearance, on my computer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: essex
Posts: 2,252
|
it depends on your hard ware if you have a 1.5 gh or faster cpu and 256 or moor ram and a good vid card then the profermance gains are not verry much if you have a 500mh cpu and 128 ram with shaired vid on board then it makes a big diffrence
__________________
Join the PcMech.com Folding@Home Team and Help Save Lives! Click Here! Life only looks greener on the other side of the fence |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
yeah i have a 2.4 ghz processor with 256 MB of pc3200 DDR ram, soon to get another 256 so i guess i'll keep it the way it is. (with best appearance turned on)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
I turned off all the eye candy on my own WinXP computer and noticed the computer would react to my input much quicker. Menus would pop up much quicker and the system just seems "snappier". I don't care how the desktop looks, I just want the computer to work like a computer. I don't care about how the computer "looks" (explains why all 5 of my computers are just boring beige boxes).
Most of the people I build computers for like to have all the eye candy turned on and have been requesting fancy cases. To each his own I guess. Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
|
It depends on what "eye candy" you're talking about. Changing the colour scheme from the XP look to a more classic look doesn't make any difference. Turning off things like scrolling or fading menus does make a difference.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
does turning off "eye-candy" make a dif
Nah, it happens. Turning down "eye-candy" is something to be concerned with.
__________________
Women are better people, Men are better men Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 (build 2600) Dell E521 1.90 gigahertz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core PHILIPS DVD-ROM TEAC USB HS-CF Card Device WDC WD800JD-75MSA3 [Hard drive] (80.00 GB) -- drive 0, s/n WD-WMAM9KL69938, rev 10.01E04, SMART Status: Healthy 2048 Megabytes NVIDIA nForce 430/410 Serial ATA Cntl(2x) NVIDIA GeForce 7300 LE[Display adapter]Soyo 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor 24D6 Processor Intel Pentium III, 501 MHz System Board ICO Peripherals, Inc. Intel 440ZX BIOS ASl, Inc. 4.51 PG 06/03/99 Chipset Intel 82443BX Memory 512 MB Memory Type 256+256;|DIMM|SDRAM|;T5 Video board S3 Graphics Inc. Savage4 Video mode 800x600, 32 bits/pixel XP 5.1.2600 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
Ill try turning it all off and setting it for best performance for a day or two and see which one i like better. thanks for everyones help
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
I set all of mine to best perf. And there is a diff, it benches 10% faster in office apps with it set to look like 98/me/2k.
The pretty stuff takes a toll. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|