|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 315
|
32 bit vs. 64 bit
What is the difference between a windows 32-bit and a windows 64-bit?
I don't really care what OS you explain it for, but I am planning on getting a W7 just so you know. All I know is that you can stuff as much ram in a 64-bit as you are able to, while in the 32-bit you are restricted to 3GB. And I've also heard that windows is planning on making a 128-bit for W8? What would that do? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
64 bit in a nutshell allows the CPU to accomplish more work per CPU cycle. 128 bit would do the same although I am not aware of any near future plans for 128 bit computing.
With Windows 7 there is no reason that I know of for not purchasing the 64 bit version, partially as you say because it can utilize more RAM.
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity | |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 315
|
Thank you
Now I'm completely sure I want 64-bit instead of 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,652
|
The number of bits is just the length of the memory registers and addresses. You probably wont notice any performance difference unless you are running a memory intensive applications that are 64bit themselves. You will be able to use more RAM. I doubt the next iteration of Windows will be 128bit, there isn't a need.
__________________
LP |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 60
|
Does win7 64 bit have the drawbacks that xp64 did? Like nonexistent driver support?
__________________
Asus m2n32-sli deluxe wireless ed. ~ AMD Athlon 64 x2 6400+ 3.2 ghz ~ BFG Nvidia 7950gt 512mb, 2 in sli ~ Corsair XMS2 4gb ram ~ Western Digital HD 700gb ~ Antec 850 Truepower PSU ~ Antec 900 case ~ Win XP Home 32bit SP3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,109
|
Yes and No. XP64 sucked when it comes to drivers. In theroy, win7 64 bit is going on newer machines aka newer hardware where the makers have a vested interest in making 64 bit drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 60
|
Thanks, still kind of wary of going to 64 bit...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,109
|
If you're running a 7 year old socket A mobo - yes - be worried.
Or - look for drivers before making the switch
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 785
|
In the past I heard many programs do not run under a 64-bit OS. Is that no longer true with Win7 64-bit?
__________________
1: HTPC: Intel BadAxe2 / Intel Core2 Duo E6600 / Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800 2GB + TeamElite DDR2 800 1GB / Galaxy GT430 / Seagate 320GB SATA3.0 7200.10 / LG DVD-RW / Seagate 250GB UltraATA100 / Samsung FDD / PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 / Cooler Master Centurion 534 / Vizio 55" LCD / Win 7 Ultimate 2: Gigabyte GA-970A-D3 / AMD Phenom II X4 955 / Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 8GB / Asus ATI Radeon EAH3850/G / Seagate 500GB SATA3.0 7200.11 + 1 GB 7200.12 / Samsung DVDRW / Asus DVD-ROM / Sony FDD / Corsair 550W PSU CMPSU-550VX / Cooler Master Mystique Case / HannsG 19" LCD / Klipsch Pro Media 2.1 / Windows Vista Ultimate |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: PA USA
Posts: 1,040
|
I only had one program that didn't work on 64 bit. That was a 15 year old addressbook program. I updated to a new one for $30 and couldn't be happier.
__________________
#1 HP 5310 500Hard Drive 350gb.Toshiba external back-up 4gb. Ram Win.7 Professional 64bit. #2 Sony Lap Top 500 gb. hard drive 3.0ghz AMD Athlon 4gb Ram Win.7 Home Premium 64 bit |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 60
|
My mobo is am2 upgradeable to am2+ so it should be fine with windows 7 64 bit.
Theoretically 32 bit programs should work in 64 bit windows, both AMD and Intel have it built into the processors - and it's both the same technology from AMD |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 336
|
That all sounds about right. I'm running an old socket 939 (now 5 years old) and I haven't had any trouble with 64 bit systems.
The odd thing about 64 bit systems is that when you install 32 bit program it puts it in a separate folder called program files (x86). Not sure why Windows does this but it seems to workout so I'm not complaining.
__________________
PC: Centurion 5 case, ASUS M4A87TD-EVO, AMD 3.0ghz Quad Core, Patriot 8gb DDR3, EVGA 7800 GT, 3 dvd burners, 550 watt psu Laptop: Sony Vaio FW 390 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
Quote:
Under Win7 64 and Vista 64, the 32 bit programs install automatically in the Program Files (x86) folder and the 64 bit programs are in the regular Program Files folder. If you are ever curious which is which then look in those two folders. My computer has quite a few more 32 bit applications than 64 bit applications Last edited by David M; 07-16-2010 at 08:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ada, Michigan USA
Posts: 270
|
I found only one program that would not run in Windows 7 64 bit and that was Adobe Indesign CS2.
All my other Adobe software worked fine. I had to upgrade to the latest version of Indesign to get it to work. The only other problem that I ran into was finding drivers for my Epson scanner. There just aren't any, I had to buy a 3rd party software package to use it. Mike |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|