|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 43
|
Hello, I'm running windows 7 - Lenovo thinkpad edge with 500 GB HD.
I'm planning to split the HD and install Linux + dual boot software. What's your take on this since I'm a bit skeptic about splitting and using one part of the HD just for Linux. Thanks, Mk! Last edited by stcordero; 03-10-2011 at 09:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
People do this all the time. It's a great idea. I used to have a triple boot between XP and Vista 32 and Vista 64. No longer, I just wanted to see if I could do it.
The only downside I see is the drive space you will have remaining for each OS. It won't be a whole lot but I'm sure you already know that. It's probably safe to assume Windows 7 will eventually need as much as 50 Gigs as it bloats with each update. No idea about the size of Linux, which is smaller. The Windows partition will probably need to be a bit larger than the Linux partition.
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity | Last edited by David M; 03-10-2011 at 03:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
Either that or buy a new HD just for Linux your ideas? Mk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Calif.
Posts: 529
|
Another option would be to install something like Virtual Box which would allow you to run Linux in a virtual machine on your Win 7 desktop. The cool thing about it is that you can have both OSes running simultaneously.
Virtual Box is open source and free.
__________________
Been using, building, repairing and programming computers for nearly 30 years now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
Doesn't virtualization run apps slower? I don't know, just what I have heard. Never tried it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
any thoughts about it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
|
Unless you need to be running two OS's simultaneously, I would do a partition. Just my uneducated thoughts about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
|
You could also boot with a live Linux CD or DVD and run it from that without installing it on the hard drive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Calif.
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
In the large software firm I work for, we have converted almost all of our physical test servers to virtual servers which has saved the company lots of money, fewer machines, less physical space, less air conditioning load, etc... If you haven't tried virtual software you should before you talk it down. You probably wouldn't want to use a VM for hard core gaming... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|