Go Back   PCMech Forums > Windows Support > Windows OS Support (Vista/7/8)

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-10-2011, 08:53 AM   #1
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 43
Question double boot with windows 7

Hello, I'm running windows 7 - Lenovo thinkpad edge with 500 GB HD.
I'm planning to split the HD and install Linux + dual boot software.
What's your take on this since I'm a bit skeptic about splitting and using one part of the HD just for Linux.
Thanks,
Mk!

Last edited by stcordero; 03-10-2011 at 09:03 AM.
stcordero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 10:00 AM   #2
Techphile.
 
David M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
People do this all the time. It's a great idea. I used to have a triple boot between XP and Vista 32 and Vista 64. No longer, I just wanted to see if I could do it.

The only downside I see is the drive space you will have remaining for each OS. It won't be a whole lot but I'm sure you already know that. It's probably safe to assume Windows 7 will eventually need as much as 50 Gigs as it bloats with each update. No idea about the size of Linux, which is smaller. The Windows partition will probably need to be a bit larger than the Linux partition.
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity |

Last edited by David M; 03-10-2011 at 03:58 PM.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 11:08 AM   #3
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
People do this all the time. It's a great idea. I used to have a triple boot between XP and Vista 32 and Vista 64. No longer, I just wanted to see if I could do it.

The only downside I see is the drive space you will have remaining for each OS. It won't be a whole lot but I'm sure you already know that. It's probably safe to assume Windows 7 will eventually need as much as 50 Gigs as it grows with each update. No idea about the size of Linux, which is smaller. The Windows partition will probably need to be a bit larger than the Linux partition.
I'm using 100 gb for Linux - I used a dual boot that doesn't take space with vista before cant remember the name now, but it was a nightmare to uninstall.
Either that or buy a new HD just for Linux
your ideas?
Mk
stcordero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 02:11 PM   #4
Member (10 bit)
 
strollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Calif.
Posts: 529
Another option would be to install something like Virtual Box which would allow you to run Linux in a virtual machine on your Win 7 desktop. The cool thing about it is that you can have both OSes running simultaneously.

Virtual Box is open source and free.
__________________
Been using, building, repairing and programming computers for nearly 30 years now.
strollin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 03:52 PM   #5
Techphile.
 
David M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
Doesn't virtualization run apps slower? I don't know, just what I have heard. Never tried it.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 03:56 PM   #6
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by strollin View Post
Another option would be to install something like Virtual Box which would allow you to run Linux in a virtual machine on your Win 7 desktop. The cool thing about it is that you can have both OSes running simultaneously.

Virtual Box is open source and free.
Uhm, this might be like vmware?? I'll look into....
any thoughts about it?
stcordero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 04:01 PM   #7
Techphile.
 
David M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,962
Unless you need to be running two OS's simultaneously, I would do a partition. Just my uneducated thoughts about it.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 05:55 PM   #8
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
You could also boot with a live Linux CD or DVD and run it from that without installing it on the hard drive.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 08:19 PM   #9
Member (10 bit)
 
strollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N. Calif.
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
Doesn't virtualization run apps slower? I don't know, just what I have heard. Never tried it.
Yes, but with today's dual & quad core (and more) processors, gads of memory and almost limitless disk space, virtualization is a very viable method to run multiple OSes.

In the large software firm I work for, we have converted almost all of our physical test servers to virtual servers which has saved the company lots of money, fewer machines, less physical space, less air conditioning load, etc...

If you haven't tried virtual software you should before you talk it down.

You probably wouldn't want to use a VM for hard core gaming...
strollin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2