|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 131
|
version of this file is not compatible ...
I tried to install an old Lotus 123 application on a friend's new Win7 (Home Premium) PC and received the message, "version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running". I did some 'net searching and learned this could be caused by attempting to install a 16-bit application.
A Microsoft article (HOW TO: Identify a 16-bit Program in Windows XP) describes how to tell if an application is 16-bit, i.e., 16-bit programs do not have a Version tab in its Properties box. The program I tried to install does have a Version tab. I also tried to run it in XP mode with no success. Later, I find out XP Mode is unique to Win 7 Professional. Wonder why Home Premium even allowed me to try. I'm reluctant to add a layer of complexity for my friend by setting up a virtual machine. I've never even set up a VM, so I'm not sure it even does add some complexity for my friend who is a true novice. Any suggestions? Personally, I'm still running XP SP3 and know squat about Win7. Thanks for any suggestions you can offer, EdP |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
|
1-2-3 is just too old. Your friend needs to buy M$ Office (Excel) or install one of the compatible open source office suites such as Libre Office or Open Office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 131
|
Thanks (as usual) GLC ...
Many moons ago, when 1-2-3 was fresh (1A), I developed a significant number of applications using 1-2-3's backslash macro capabilities. I continued doing the same with following versions and even held classes for 1-2-3 beginners. My friend asked me to write a stock portfolio tracking application using 1-2-3, which I did, and he loves it. I've tried to wean him off telling him I ain't gonna last forever and he'll have an awful time finding someone who can maintain it, but to no avail. I guess now's the time for him to finally give it up and get something else, such as Quicken. Thanks again. I feel justifiably unburdened. EdP |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
|
If it runs on XP, what you need to do is use the Anytime Upgrade to upgrade it to Win 7 Pro, then use XP Mode - what you tried is XP Compatibility - not the same thing. XP Mode is a full VM.
I can relate to legacy custom software - I know a lawyer that still uses Word Perfect 5.1 for DOS, he doesn't want to give up all the macros he's written over the past 15+ years. I've seen him work, and if he had to use a Windows-based word processor it would take him 3 times as long to get his work done. Sorry - I thought all you wanted to do is standard spreadsheets. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 131
|
>Sorry - I thought all you wanted to do is standard spreadsheets. <
I asked a generic question and you gave me a generic answer. Can't ask for more than that. What I learned is that I'll be getting Win 7 Professional with my next PC so I can run MY dusty spreadsheets. ![]() >Word Perfect 5.1 for DOS< I remember that as well as subsequent releases. What I loved about Word Perfect was its reveal window (I'm not sure that's what it was called, though). I always liked looking under the covers. EdP |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,791
|
Even the Windows versions of WP had Reveal Codes - a great feature.
Have you read up on XP Mode? It looks pretty easy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 131
|
>Have you read up on XP Mode?<
Not yet, but I sure will before I get my next PC - which may be in just a few months. I'm not going to mess with my friend's PC, but find an alternative method for him to track his investments. As always, thanks for the advice. You will probably be hearing from me again. ![]() EdP |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|