|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
05-07-2013, 01:20 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
|
De frag
I have a desktop computer running Windows 7. If I defrag with Auslogics defrag it does it in no time. If I straight afterwards run the Microsoft de-fragger, it takes ages and makes many passes.
My question is which one is accurate and the best to use? Thank you, Jack UK. |
|
|
|
05-07-2013, 03:30 AM
|
#2 |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,472
|
I use Auslogics and don't recommend using two different ones...
__________________
Imagine a world where dogs took bad owners to the pound... |
|
|
|
|
05-07-2013, 10:27 AM
|
#3 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,802
|
I use defraggler.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
05-08-2013, 05:01 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
|
Does anyone know how efficient the Windows defrag is, and is it as good or better than independent ones from the web?
|
|
|
|
|
05-08-2013, 05:52 AM
|
#5 |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,472
|
Now a days, defragging isn't as important as it used to be. With the huge increase in CPU performance, one hardly notices any differences in disk read/write performance.
You could test this yourself. It appears that you last used the Windows version... Wait a few weeks and use the other one you have to test and see if you notice any difference. |
|
|
|
|
05-08-2013, 10:43 AM
|
#6 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
|
Solved
Thanks everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
