|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Soopa Squishy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,175
|
Firefox tweaks
found this on another forum. worked great for speeding up firefox
If you want to increase the speed of your browsing with Firefox, follow these simple directions: Open Firefox. Type "about:config" in the adress bar (no quotation marks). Find these options, double click each one and change to below values: network.http.max-connections: 48 network.http.max-connections-per-server: 24 network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-proxy: 12 network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server: 6 network.http.pipelining: true network.http.pipelining.maxrequests: 32 network.http.proxy.pipelining: true Close Firefox and enjoy the faster browsing.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 / EVGA NF68-T1 680i SLI / EVGA 320mb 8800GTS / Western Digital Raptor 74GB / 4x1024 Mushkin eXtreme Performance / OCZ Modstream 520w / Antec P180 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
|
Is there any downside to doing what you have listed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Soopa Squishy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,175
|
none that i have found
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 178
|
Wow! Really speeds things up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 78
|
Thanks... looking good here so far!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 26
|
works great.. thanx shadowbreaker513
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 855
|
Just did it. Where should I expect to see a change?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Northeast, Michigan
Posts: 1,063
|
Applied these to Mozilla, and they work equally as well.
thanks for the tip Mike
__________________
Registered linux user # 217167 - Be counted http://counter.li.org/ Currently running: Desktop - XP Pro, Fedora HP dv9700z CTO laptop, running Windows 7 Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 855
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member (1 million bit!)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,160
|
It has to do with both.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 855
|
What if you were to make the settings even higher?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
More connections means more load on the server, I suggest you don't increase the numbers any more unless you usually open very large numbers of tabs. The majority won't find any difference between these numbers and higher numbers I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 855
|
I sometimes have 12-20 tabs open. Is that what you mean by a large number of tabs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,441
|
be very careful about doing this on a company network...you will increase the amount of traffic on the network and will set off alarms at the network management console. it will pick up the spike in network traffic (for no apparent reason) and may flag it as a potential security breach. It will probably drive the IT guys nuts as they try to figure out why and unhappy IT guys are not fun guys.
what you are doing is increasing the number of sessions that the browser will keep active at any given time rather than dropping them when they are inactive (invisibly to you). The more sessions that are active the more packets sent to maintain the connections and the more traffic the external sites have to deal with. Last edited by mbossman2; 11-23-2004 at 10:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Soopa Squishy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,175
|
^^exactly why I don't do it on the computers with firefox at school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
I did these tweaks on one of my computers this morning and didn't notice any difference in browser performance at all.
Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Soopa Squishy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,175
|
I mainly notice the difference on things like forum site loading time which has many images loaded from different sites. cut my normal 2-3 second loading time to 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Resident Intel Fanboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,669
|
biggest performance increase (especially for sites you visit often) is adblock everything ya can, even normal images ya don't wanna see
Then you only get the content ya want.
__________________
...wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat... |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Sibak
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,080
|
VERY NICE
Much Faster on my PC!
__________________
By knowing what we value We will know what we want And how to act in life |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
Good post Shadowbreaker, love the tweaks! Now when I load into forums, it comes up instantly...and I have cable..so my web surfin is a breeze
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Anime:Any-may
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kota Bharu, Malaysia
Posts: 2,447
|
Quote:
__________________
CPU: Intel E-5200. Graphics: Saphire Radeon 4770 HD 512 MB. Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP43-DS3L. Memory: Corsair XMS2 Xtreme Performance 4 GB ( 2 x 2 GB ), Chasis: Antec Three Hundred. PSU: Corsair CX400W. Optical Drive: Sony Optiarc SATA DVD +-RW. Storage: Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB SATA. Peripherals: Dell E1905EP 19" UltraSharp LCD; LG M227WD (Dual screen), HP 4180 Printer, Canon S400SP Printer & Lide20 Scanner; Philiphs HP 890, Edifier MP230. OS: Win 7 (64 bit). Laptop: Toshiba Satellite M50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member (1 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
these settings make you download sites considerably faster, BUT put a great overload on the sites you go to. This really means nothing other then the fact that anyone else browsing will just go slower and you will absorb their speed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
I didn't see much of an increase, but I guess I can't really since every page I go to loads fast enough for me... Mostly PC Mech is all I go on the net for these days... How I spend hours at the computer is still beyond me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member (3 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
|
I haven't seen much of an increase either? Usually loads fast enough anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 484
|
I didn't notice any speed increase at all. I'm assuming that these settings are supposed to do the same job as DAP, search for other availible download mirrors(in this case open more bandwidth use for browser?) I didn't find any download speed with DAP and I can't notice any difference with Mozillas site loading. Did I do something wrong?
__________________
Sig removed by moderator - oversize image
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
Would it slow download speed on other programs?
__________________
To err is human--and to blame it on a computer is even more so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 163
|
Do you know how to do this with Opera?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11
|
This tweak add's some bloatedness but well worth it, I only get .4mbits down avg x.x
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|