Late last month I received Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade in the mail. The upgrade comes provided with both the 32 and 64-bit editions – each on a separate DVD which are very plainly marked. And no, there aren’t two separate licenses. The license is a singular and applies whichever you decide to go with.
Currently I am running the Windows 7 RC 32-bit edition. My PC is capable of running 32 or 64. Being that the RC won’t expire until March 2010, I have plenty of time to decide whether to stay with 32 or go 64.
I have not upgraded yet.
The reason I’m waiting on upgrading from my RC to the full edition is because I’m performing research on 32 vs. 64 for my personal computing experience.
I do champion 64-bit processing and apps, make no mistake. However I’m seriously considering staying in 32-bit world for now because of the current hardware and software I use.
Hardware
In 64-bit world there are things you have to take into consideration that you’d ordinarily never have to think about.
Mouse
My mouse is made by Microsoft and uses the Intellipoint software in order to gain functionality, such as having the wheel-click as a double-click (which I use all the time.) Does Microsoft provide a 64-bit version of Intellipoint? Yes, they do. All you have to do is do a Google search for microsoft intellipoint 64-bit and you’ll find it.
Webcam
My webcam is made by Logitech. When I go to their web site and search for 64-bit drivers, do they exist? Yes. They exist for Windows Vista 64-bit, but these will work in Windows 7 without a problem, so I’m covered there.
Other hardware
For other hardware like printers, tablets or for whatever else you use, you must seek out 64-bit drivers so they work properly in a native 64-bit OS environment, else you may run into wonky issues.
Software
Quick question answered: Do 32-bit apps work in a 64-bit OS? Most of the time they will. It is not a universal "yes" because of the way some apps are programmed.
For example, I use Mozilla Thunderbird as my mail application. Do they have a 64-bit edition? No, and they never have. There are unofficial 64-bit ports of that software (along with Firefox), but no from-Mozilla official releases.
Fortunately I have read that 32-bit editions of Mozilla products will work just fine in a 64-bit environment, so even if I chose to run the 32-bit versions, they will operate without issue.
When it comes to other software however, there can be problems.
You can think of running 32-bit apps in a 64-bit environment in the same vein that we had with transitions of the past.
For those of you that remember the transition from MS-DOS/Windows 3.1 to Windows 95, there were many 16-bit apps that simply did not work in the 32-bit Windows 95 environment at all. On attempt to run them, they’d simply not work, crash and well.. that was that.
For those of you that remember the Windows 98 to Windows XP transition, that was a somewhat better experience. Being that Windows 98 apps were natively 32-bit, most worked in XP without a problem – except for those that didn’t know how to handle the NT environment (which 2000/XP is.)
Most apps in XP will migrate to Windows 7 32-bit flavor easily. I know this from personal experience as I’ve been using Windows 7 RC for many months. This is because once again you’re going from 32-bit to 32-bit. It is unlikely you’d find any 32-bit XP app that absolutely would not work in Windows 7 32-bit edition.
When going 64 however, you have to bear in mind that the under-the-hood way of which things are run are distinctively different.
How to prepare for 64-bit
Once you’ve confirmed that your hardware is all 64-bit capable, you basically have to research each software title you have to see if it will actually work in 64-bit world. This can be time consuming but well worth the effort knowing what will work and what won’t.
You can get a list of all your software simply by going to the Add/Remove section of Windows. I know of very few programs that do not list themselves there these days. From there you just perform a Google search using the title of the software and 64-bit, such as "photoshop 64-bit", "wacom tablet 64-bit" or the like. Performing any search of this type will immediately bring up results either in the form of the respective company web site, blogs and/or forums informing you if said software runs in a 64-bit environment effectively – if at all.
I don’t want to give off the impression that you shouldn’t go 64-bit, because this is the way desktop computing is heavily leaning towards. However it is a fact at present that the vast majority of hardware and software are specifically designed for 32-bit environments only, and this will remain the case for at least another 5 years.
Leave A Reply (7 comments So Far)
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Sharron Field
1193 days ago
I’ve been using 64-bit Windows 7 since the RC. I thought that my webcam wouldn’t work in 64-bit until very recently; but realised that it just needed a new driver after Windows 7 eventually told me so. Anything that doesn’t have a 64-bit version runs perfectly fine in a 32-bit emulation mode inside the 64-bit OS.
I’ve had no problems running everything that I fomerly ran in XP 32-bit in Win 7 64-bit, and I doubt you will have any either.
Rich Menga
1193 days ago
“Anything that doesn’t have a 64-bit version runs perfectly fine in a 32-bit emulation mode inside the 64-bit OS.”
There is no guarantee whatsoever that all 32-bit software will emulate properly in a 64-bit environment.
The proper answer is that most software will work properly, but certainly not all. Absolutely nobody can prove 100% that “anything” 32-bit will work in 64.
Sharron Field
1193 days ago
I agree with you in that you may well be right: I was talking about my own personal situation. – Perhaps I should have made that clearer.
Sharron Field
1163 days ago
“However it is a fact at present that the vast majority of hardware and software are specifically designed for 32-bit environments only, and this will remain the case for at least another 5 years.”
I disagree with the figure of 5 years: It is my opinion; and only an opinion I stress, that as manufacturers and software-writers observe the large move that has already started at time of writing to a 64-bit computing environment, so they will begin producing more and more 64-bit apps and drivers, to some extent in haste, in order to keep up with their respective target markets.
Jay Bach
384 days ago
I have been running 64-bit on my notebook since May 2010. I have not had any problems that I noticed with the exception of my scanner drivers, which, I can probably attribute to Paperport’s protection from someone stealing their program more than I can to Windows 7.
Consequently I am running my scanner with Paperport on my older XP machine. I was thinking of finding someone that would write a program but got cheaped out. Fortunately, it now appears that I may be able to get someone from xerox to point me to a place to get a decent driver written. If anyone, BTW, knows someone let me know. Thanks
Jay
Rich Menga
384 days ago
@Jay Bach – Here’s something that might work (but no guarantees):
Purposely run the Paperport *installer* as “XP compatible” in Windows 7 64 and it might launch and install properly. Right-click the installer file (usually called “setup” or something similar), select Properties. From the window that pops up, select the Compatibility tab, check the box “Run this program in compatibility mode for” and select “Windows XP (Service Pack 3)”. Then click Apply, OK and try double-clicking the installer to run it. Hopefully it will go through without issue.
Rich Menga
384 days ago
@Jay Bach – One other thing, driver files are located in the hidden folder C:\WINDOWS\INF. If you have the .INF files needed for the scanner but the installer doesn’t work, you can try manually copying the files to the INF folder, plug in a scanner and Win7 might auto-detect it without issue. But again, no guarantees.